The brand new overarching question that instructions this research are: About what the amount, plus in just what implies, try gender differences manifested within the contemporary teen cam sites? I target it concern of the evaluating four amounts of communications: microlinguistic, discourse-pragmatic, stylistic, and you can graphic. In line with the books surveyed in the previous point, we posit next hypotheses:
H1: Few, if any, intercourse differences will be located on the amount of individual term alternatives (microlinguistic top) for the teen chat rooms.
Which presumption try supported by the active exposure away from heterosexual flirtatious relations, additionally the lack of exact same-intercourse flirtatious communication, we seen to the websites
The initial theory is dependant on the results regarding Huffaker and you can Calvert (2005), Guiller & Durndell, 2006, and you may Herring and Paolillo (2006); the following towards the conclusions from the Herring ( 1992, 1993, 2003) although some; the third for the conclusions said from the Cherny (1994), Herring (2003), and you will Thelwall ainsi que al. (2010); therefore the hypotheses on graphic worry about-symbolization derive from the fresh findings out of Scheidt (2004) and you may Siibak (2009). Such hypotheses don’t posit you to definitely a significant difference possess took place more big date (age.grams., on the fewer otherwise reduced traditional sex differences). As an alternative, since a great heuristic, we embrace the traditional expectation one what has been found within the prior degree off gender and you may CMC is probable however as genuine for adolescent chat. Although not, new hypotheses try at the mercy of disconfirmation, whereby, you to expectation might possibly be titled for the concern.